By Alexandria Jane.
The Russians are interfering with our elections!!!
THE RUSSIANNNSSSSS!!!!!!!!! RREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That’s the narrativee that we’ve become familiar with as we listen to leftist media lie through their teeth about why the National Socialist party of America; Democrat, Peace and Freedom, Libertarian, and Green conglomerate; lost the 2016 presidential election. And over and over again, the same talking heads will echo the same misleading sentiment that campaign contributions are bribes, clearly attacking Citizens United.
Citizens United is righteous in comparison to the underhanded and totally corrupt methods by which the left undermines elections and gives astronomical amounts of laundered campaign contributions to treasonous candidates through political proxies disguised as social and environmental justice organizations.
I’m bracing myself. I know I’ll be called a racist, homophobic, anti-environmentalist who kills kittens for sport to invalidate the points that I’m about to make.
First, Citizens United is a conservative organization that won a Supreme Court case against the Federal Election Committee (FEC). Citizens United was attempting to distribute a documentary critical of Hillary Clinton within 30 days of the election when they were halted by the FEC. Citizens United argued that the documentary was not electioneering communication, therefore it didn’t fall under the rules of the Federal Election Campaign act and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, no permit was necessary, and they should have been allowed to exercise their first amendment right to freedom of speech, to be allowed to distribute the movie through a cable provider freely. [4,5]
Ultimately the question of censorship and political discourse led the court to determine that censoring Citizens United could set a legal precedence that could allow mainstream media corporations to be censored; they should be the least censored corporation. The court ruled that corporations have a right to express themselves politically, and that money is a form of speech. Liberals complained that such corporation donation, money earned by the corporation, not a pool of dues that people must pay in order to get a job (racketeering) or federal dollars, would cause government and corporations to act on a “quid pro quo” basis. The message from fake news mentally ill-liberal media was this, corporations were opportunistic extortionists and democrats were good and trustworthy sweet little oppressed angels. Hardly, I’ll demonstrate this later. [4,5]
Second, what is a proxy? A proxy is defined as:
“1. a. One appointed or authorized to act for another, especially a person appointed to vote as one wishes at a meeting.
b. The authority to act for another.
c. The written authorization to act in place of another.
2. An entity or variable used to model or generate data assumed to resemble the data associated with another entity or variable that is typically more difficult to research.
3. Computers A server that processes requests and forwards information between a client and another server. [1]”
I will illustrate one example of a proxy that is immoral and unethical and still widely believed and practiced in all religions; condemning homosexuality in order to prevent all heterosexual couples from using natural birth control, oral and anal sex. There still exist religious psychopaths who reject love and insist that all sexual intercourse must be with the goal to breed, as though we’re all deindividualized cattle, that there’s something inherently wrong with engaging in sexual acts that don’t produce unwanted children who’ll be abused by society and kill you for drug money. Homosexual sex is the same as heterosexual sex with the exception that two people of the same sex cannot have offspring without artificial interventions. (I’ve known gay couples with children and straight couples without, so I find this argument to be invalid.) Homosexual sex is a variable that closely resembles heterosexual sex, therefore homosexual sex can be used as a proxy for heterosexual sex, a way to legislate all sexuality by criminalizing and condemning one sexuality. Imagine how many caring, compassionate, and loving gay people we’ve tormented just to prevent straight couples from using anal sex as birth control. And now our prized first amendment is threatened because rigid, intolerant, orthodox religious idiots are being used as proxies for fake civil-rights national socialists who want to destroy America. Authoritarian Christians bigots are making it too easy for these treasonous fake activists to succeed. Proxies can be messed up, to say the least.
What the Democrats have done is create a variety of proxies for their national socialist agenda. Different agencies will seemingly align themselves with each other ideologically to generate and implement one ideology, a key element in successful national socialism. Give all resources to the state. Let the state redistribute everything. The state knows best. Don’t be the change you want to see in the world. Submit to the government. Submit to Allah. Submit.
The UN provides a roadmap for partisan political proxies through their UN Sustainable Development Goals. The UN has a variety of other agencies that have already infected and corrupted the US; UNESCO is a prime example of UN treason on American soil. [9]
Imagine this UN roadmap to be a cult. This cult lays out an ideology in its goals that demands sovereign states to give up their sovereignty for “good will”. This cult has an anti-human tone to it, typical of non-secular religions. We’re born bad. We only cause harm. The harm we cause is God-like in scale to make us feel awful 24/7 for living. We can only seek redemption through prespecified actions laid out by the UN. We need to pay tithes to this cult. Don’t ask questions or we aren’t righteous. Censorship is desirable, if not prescribed. Consensus trumps science. Behave a certain way. Spy on everyone around you to make sure they’re behaving too, or shame them in public for not conforming to the group. Ignore science from men, because the patriarchy is real. But don’t assume anyone’s gender because having a penis doesn’t make a male “male”. Ignore all sciences in favor of pseudoscientific Sociology and Gender Studies; censorship can only coexist with pseudoscience. Become polarized and intolerant, a giant groupthink cancer that shrieks when challenged with dissent, repelling debate in order to prevent itself from being sane. Control all aspects of government, media, and education. Kill all apostates to save the polar bears. The usual.
And true to cults, you can’t leave without losing your job and losing your social status among people you thought were your friends and family. You were a wall in an echo chamber that preached mediocrity, victimhood intersectionality theory, and arguments for socialism as though money fell from the sky. You were useful and valued as an echo, not an individual. That’s it. Get over it and move on. Get in your Hummer, smoke some cigars, take deep puffs and exhale some carbon dioxide with pride because you know you’re helping to feed trees by living, celebrate how amazing mankind is, and leave those pathetic wastes of skin behind. Imagine that you’re in a balloon cutting off extra weights so that you will stay airborne and moving forward. That’s what you’re doing. Don’t go back.
Environmentalism is one such cult. Environmentalism is also a proxy for national socialism.
Have I lost you? Are you calling me Hitler? A cunt? A Russian bot? Just relax. Ideas shouldn’t hurt you unless you’re in a cult
Again, because this is important;
Environmentalism is a proxy for national socialism, for totalitarianism. Internationally, it’s a proxy for totalitarian Communism. Notice the Marxist overtone and how it interplays with environmentalism. I elaborate on the subject a couple of paragraphs down. [10]
‘Nazism and Communism fixate on hierarchies. The racial superiority of the Aryan race is central to Nazism. Built on a foundation of pseudo-science and biological determinism that places Jews, blacks, and other minorities in very low regard, Nazism divides human society along strict religious, ethnic, and racial lines. Communism focuses on economic hierarchy – more specifically the stratification of classes. There are the “haves” and “have-nots,” and Communism seeks to empower the latter to revolt against the former. Each belief system enforces a regimented set of rules for “acceptable” political behavior – painting a very bleak “black-and-white” world with very little wiggle room for divergent political thought (Prabhat, 2018). [10]”
How can I possibly come to this conclusion that environmentalism is totalitarian national socialism and totalitarian Communism? Environmentalism is good, right? Caring about the environment is good. Wanting to be good stewards of flora, fauna, air, water, and landscapes is morally virtuous. This is true.
There’s more than one way to be good stewards of nature. Hands-on education and learning to think for oneself teaches us to act out of respect and awe instead of needing to be told what we can and cannot do. A person’s decision to use rat poison may be affected by the knowledge that rat poisons kill vultures and that vultures prevent the spread of disease by their extraordinary stomach acids; our health is benefited by making decisions that protect vultures from poisoning. A person might let an abandoned field stay infested with gophers if they know that starvation is the number one cause of barn owl deaths and that barn owls love to eat gophers. No one has to tell us what to do if we know why doing something is so important. Being environmentally conscious can be open, adventurous, and full of discovery. This is conservation.
Environmentalism on the other hand tells you what to do, what to think, and creates a McCarthyistic culture. Remember when you could report your neighbor for using too much water? We were encouraged to spy on each other in order to conserve water while the state of California was selling our water to Nestle during a fabricated drought. Fossil fuels are now bad, so schools and workplaces have special parking spaces for self-righteous Greenies who think destroying the earth’s crust for rare metals, leaving land highly radioactive and barren, making people sick and animals sterile in order to drive an electric car is going to save the world from a fictitious manmade EcoArmageddon. We can look at each other’s cars and judge each other by how much gas our cars use, which makes driving my monster truck all the more satisfying. Environmentalism is closed, rigid, cold, discourages learning in favor or obedience, stagnant, dark, and full of fearmongering, traits found in totalitarian regimes. No bueno.
We have been duped into believing that buying more stuff, some of it worse that what it’s substituting, will save the planet. Shopping is how we practice environmentalism instead of, I don’t know, use less stuff. No, in the delusional mind of an avid environmentalist, paper is more environmentally harmful than using a laptop that needs power to function. Mining for rare metals to make laptops is not more environmentally friendly than chopping down a fucking tree to make a fucking sheet of fucking paper to these lunatics. Seriously, this is fucking insane.
Products and rituals are aligned to drive our behavior in order to drive our thinking. Humans are bad polluters. Humans are unnatural. Everyone should think that people are polluters and change their behavior to seek social redemption for being born eco-sinners; nationalism. Pollution is the product of capitalism so destroy capitalism. Grow money trees and raise geese that lay golden eggs to generate funds for the government to redistribute as they wish. We’ll all be equal; unfree and powerless from tyranny.
Environmentalism is a doomsday cult; it’s not about caring for the environment. And environmental non-profits are so self-righteous when they deceptively present themselves to media, schools, and politicians. You don’t support Greenpeace? The World Wildlife Fund? The Sierra Club? Climate Action? Planned Parenthood? Then you are a detestable human being, because who can be against caring about the environment? This suggests an ideological hierarchy of sorts. A bourgeoisie of rich polluting “the haves”, like Big Oil Satan, and a proletariat of environmental “have nots”. Pseudoscientific environmentalism, of which there’s plenty, is no different from pseudoscientific racism because the goal is guide beliefs to control the behavior and cognitions of large masses of people. Actually, Hitler considered genocide environmentalism.
Ever heard of The Club of Rome? Agenda 21? Agenda 2030? Nope? [6,7,8]
These agencies are all part of the same anti-American, Marxist ideology that rely on pseudoscience and contempt for the bourgeoisie to get you to give them money so that their employees can funnel it into the Democrat party. We’re talking about tens of millions of dollars. Not just that, if you believe the narrative that these non-profits endorse because you don’t understand social grooming, you will believe that if the Democrats don’t win, mankind will kill itself and the planet. Who will save the polar bears without us always asking for more money to launder to Democrats while grooming people to believe one narrative based on pseudoscience that coincidentally aligns with one political party that has sold out to the United Nations while we complain about Citizens United being bribery.
Planned Parenthood received hundreds of millions of dollars in federal money and their employees donate millions of dollars to the DNC; it’s illegal to use federal dollars to fund partisan politics. Kind of seems like money laundering to me. Maybe bribery. For example:
‘Also for the 2016 election cycle, individuals and entities connected with Planned Parenthood poured over $15.9 million into outside spending, defined by the Center for Responsive Politics as “independent expenditures or electioneering communications.”
Planned Parenthood receives approximately $500 million from federal taxpayers each year for Medicaid and Title X Family Planning, both programs intended for low-income Americans.’ [2,3]
Marxist college campuses peddling national socialism receive federal funds and they push pseudoscience that aligns with the Democrat party. They hold events that would have you believe that the UN isn’t a global criminal enterprise, teaching fairy tales to students to protect the worst evils on this planet that also aligns with the treasonous Democrat platform. They will host American traitors like Kamala Harris because she has melanin and a vagina and no conscience. Federal money is laundered to the Democrat party through student government because colleges care about the environment and social justice, proxies for totalitarianism. Too bad colleges don’t care about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as much as they care about illegally funding the destruction of America.
Aquariums will peddle pseudoscience, the Sierra Club will publish pseudoscience, and Greenpeace will vandalize private property as faux activism because they’re a theater for pseudoscience. This is the Democrats version of Citizens United if Citizens United drank some radioactive blood from Kathy Griffin in a contaminated bottle of soda and was later bitten by a radioactive spider after swimming though toxic ponds of lithium waste. Grant money for pseudoscientific causes is the equivalent of Citizens United with stage 10 cancer. Grant money requires “non-profits” to accept and peddle a narrative that aligns with one political party. This is far worse that a corporation making a direct donation to a PAC, a political candidate, or party. At least Citizens United isn’t psychologically terrorizing innocent people to manufacture one ideology, environmentalism, to push an anti-American agenda; national socialism. Capitalism harms the environment because “the haves” don’t care about the “have nots”.
Any social justice retard will tell you that capitalism is the problem and national socialism is the solution. Dude, if you were planning on wasting a couple of years and tens of thousands of dollars on a bogus Sociology degree at a UC or CSU, I just saved you loads of time and money. This is all treasonous colleges want you to “learn”. You’re welcome.
This national socialist agenda is a proxy for election fraud by Democrats and RINO’s.
The election fraud by proxy in support of the Democrats is tough to measure. From daily planners in a college book store that virtue signal with depictions of raptor-chopping inefficient wind turbines to marches on college campuses for pseudoscience organized by PACs that cater to Democrats, China, and the UN are forms of election fraud because they push a narrative that promotes one ideology, national socialism; environmentalism; mainly the Democrats.
Citizens United is not the problem. Elections are more honest and fairer as a result of the Supreme Court ruling of Citizens United v The FEC. Probably the only honest and humane election funding there is.
Citizens United is holy in comparison.
[1] The Free Dictionary by Farlex, (2018). https://www.thefreedictionary.com/proxy
[2] Jessen, L., (2016). Tax-Funded Planned Parenthood Spending $38 Million to Push Hillary and Pro-Abortion Democrats. Life News.com, retrieved from: https://www.lifenews.com/2016/11/04/tax-funded-planned-parenthood-spending-38-million-to-push-hillary-and-pro-abortion-democrats/
[3] Open secrets (2016). Profile for 2016 election cycle. Open Secrets: Center for responsive politics, retrieved from: https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000000591&cycle=2016
[4] Citizens United (2010). About Citizens United v Federal Election Commission. Citizens United, Retrieved from: http://www.cuvfec.com/about-case.aspx
[5] SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (2009). CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Retrieved from: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-205.pdf
[6] Club of Rome https://www.clubofrome.org/
[7] Agenda 21 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21
[8] Agenda 2030 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
[9] UNESCO https://en.unesco.org/
[10] Prabhat S. (2018). “Difference Between Communism and Nazism.” DifferenceBetween.net. Retrieved from: http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/difference-between-communism-and-nazism/
Read more: Difference Between Communism and Nazism | Difference Between http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/difference-between-communism-and-nazism/#ixzz5VTB6fjSh
Alexandria Jane 