By Alexandria Jane.
Politics is downwind of culture.
If you’re at all familiar with the intellectual and scientific void that is the University of California constellation of anti-American cancer, then you’re probably familiar with how UC’s operate like a Soviet Union Nomenklatura, an elite group of people who infiltrate and affect all agencies that affect culture knowing that politics is downwind of culture, to push totalitarian national socialism with impunity.
UC’s attack American culture to attack American politics, like cancer attacks a body.
This cancer is attacking conservative professors and anyone on campus who defend them.
Professor Keith Fink was fired by this cancer.
First, I can’t stress enough how important the story is about the professional lynching of Keith Fink and Jason Gelzhiser. For everyone who was suspicious about the motives behind the orchestrated attack on American culture by social justice proxies, this is evidence to confirm your worst suspicions; social justice is totalitarianism; producing the opposite effects of what it claims to accomplish; achieving inequality, division, and exclusion instead of equality, diversity, and inclusion.
Who is Keith Fink? I have attached some links to various speeches and related articles regarding his lynching by UCLA administrators where you can learn more about his extraordinary credentials. Fink is a UCLA alumnus, a professor at UCLA in the Communications department, holding the record as the best national debater in UCLA’s history, as well as an accomplished lawyer with his own firm, earning excellent evaluations from his clients, from his students, and from his actual peers. [1,2,3]
He describes himself in his course syllabus:
“I am a UCLA alumnus who spent most of his time at UCLA in the then Speech Department debating for the school. While I am a litigator who specializes in employment law, I have taught for many years in the areas of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties. My website http://www.finklawfirm.com can give you some more background information on me. [4]”
So what exactly happened? What went wrong? How do I even start? I cannot believe what has happened to this guy. Except that I attended UC Irvine. I am very familiar with student government and their anti-American alliance with administration and the UC Regents. I’ve long argued that UCI is where you go to learn how not learn, to learn how not to think. Fink says the same thing about what UCLA has become. And just like I was attacked for challenging this totalitarian mental illness called social justice at UCI, Fink was lynched by the same anti-intellectual, pseudoscientific cancer called Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion; social justice.
Professor Fink practiced the Socratic method in his classes with his students. The Socratic Method is:
“The oldest, and still the most powerful, teaching tactic for fostering critical thinking is Socratic teaching. In Socratic teaching we focus on giving students questions, not answers. We model an inquiring, probing mind by continually probing into the subject with questions. Fortunately, the abilities we gain by focusing on the elements of reasoning in a disciplined and self-assessing way, and the logical relationships that result from such disciplined thought, prepare us for Socratic questioning. [5]”
The Socratic Method is kind of like a mental gym that exercises the very intellectual faculties that form the basis of science and philosophy. Free speech is at the core of philosophy and science, and yet UCLA lynched a professor for using the Socratic Method and current events that sometimes challenged UCLA and administrators to better teach students debate and law in a relevant an meaningful way. The Socratic Method might lead to students learning how to think, not what to think. I know that teaching students how to think at UCI was nonexistent as students were groomed to be Marxists. What happened to Fink is not an isolated UCLA problem. It’s not even a UC problem. It is a student government problem which extends across America and across borders to Canada, all pushing the same treasonous UN rhetoric.
There are different student government organizations across the United States that all fall under the umbrella of the United States Student Association (USSA). UC student governments fall under the umbrella of the University of California Student Association (UCSA), which is under the umbrella of USSA, conveniently the source of petitions that different colleges across the US disseminate with identical wording, as though USSA controls student government agendas and goals, not college students. [6,7]
Currently, USSA is seeking college participants to generate identical petitions for a sexual assault survivor’s bill of rights in a manner that creates the illusion that different colleges agree on pressing issues, like the petitions for free college that came from USSA. Doesn’t sound like a bad idea on the surface, protecting the rights of sexual assault survivors. Enter USSA, a student lobbying organization that is part of the Nomenklatura, working in conjunction with the Democrat/National Socialist party to destroy America. The sexual assault survivor’s bill of rights is a bad thing, a really, really, really, really, really, really, really, bad thing. [8]
USSA has been lobbying for H.R. 4030, the Title IX protection act. The Demonazis didn’t take too kindly to Betsy De Vos restoring due process for the accused in sexual assault cases by rescinding parts of the Dear Colleague letter from April 4th, 2011. Obviously, Dems hate anything that protects anyone from tyranny, or they wouldn’t be so intent on destroying the 5th amendment through H.R. 4030. And how clever to use student government to get taxpayers to pay for lobbying so they don’t have to spend a dime of their own money. They’re not crooks at all. Dems won the Commiefornia midterm elections ‘ahem’ fair and ‘cough, cough’ square. They’re so honest. They deserve special badges or arm bands or something, with SS embroidered on them with black thread. [9, 10, 11, 12]
First off, what is Title IX?
“Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX) prohibits discrimination based on sex in education programs and activities in federally funded schools at all levels.1 If any part of a school district or college receives any Federal funds for any purpose, all of the operations of the district or college are covered by Title IX.2
Title IX protects students, employees, applicants for admission and employment, and other persons from all forms of sex discrimination, including discrimination based on gender identity or failure to conform to stereotypical notions of masculinity or femininity. All students (as well as other persons) at recipient institutions are protected by Title IX—regardless of their sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, part- or full-time status, disability, race, or national origin—in all aspects of a recipient’s educational programs and activities.” [13]
Remember Title IX because this plays an important role in this story. And remember that Title IX is a department under the office of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion headed by Dean Jerry Kang, whose name will return a few more times in this tale of anti-American treason. [23]
While Fink is successfully teaching courses, getting rave reviews, creating his own courses, teaching packed classrooms and always adding seniors on waiting lists, always the free speech advocate, UCLA was becoming more and more fascist, the ideology of social justice governing all aspects of campus and off-campus life. New departments were being constructed to further cultural Marxism and fascism. Students were apparently more and more sensitive, requiring trigger warnings and safe spaces, thus covertly attempting to codify censorship on a college campus that receives federal funds and get away with it. Censorship on a college campus is supposed to be unconstitutional.
Free speech was just up Fink’s alley and that alley that was gradually clogged by social justice at UCLA.
‘”The fact that I use current events at UCLA as teaching examples to illustrate free-speech principles likely bothers the administration, often because their campus-wide emails run afoul of the First Amendment and directly or indirectly trample on students’ free-speech rights,” said Mr. Fink, who was out of the country and responded to questions by email.
He has drawn the ire of administrators in other ways, too, he said. According to Mr. Fink, his conservative political beliefs have always been at odds with those of most other people on the campus. And then there was his lawyerly campus activism: On occasion he has assisted UCLA students who faced campus disciplinary or legal proceedings.’[14]
Fink actively combined current events on campus and the Socratic Method in his classroom. In doing so, he was often critical of UCLA, exposing how UCLA trampled the rights of students.
‘”The fact that I use current events at UCLA as teaching examples to illustrate free-speech principles likely bothers the administration, often because their campuswide emails run afoul of the First Amendment and directly or indirectly trample on students’ free-speech rights,” said Mr. Fink, who was out of the country and responded to questions by email.[14]’
Fink defended students who were accused of dressing in blackface and were facing severe sanctions by the school when in fact they were dressed as miners, gold diggers in reference to a song by Kanye West. The vice chancellor of the UCLA Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion, Jerry Kang, never conducted an investigation and, as you can tell by his Crosscheck website, he still hasn’t. [15]
Fink defended Alexandra Wallace, a UCLA Political Science major with great breasts, who posted a video on YouTube expressing her frustration with international students in her apartment complex and in the library; she was frustrated by the large number of students in the library calling family and friends in Japan after the devastating tsunami in 2011 while students were trying to study. When she imitates the Asians on their phones, holy shit. Internet gold. Her video, which harmed no one, quickly went viral and she was soon facing death threats and threats of punishment from UCLA. Some of the responses to her video were platinum, demonstrating how more speech is far more beneficial and healthier to repair social fumbles compared to social justice censorship and sanctions. Check out the links below. You’ll be singing “Ching chong” for days. [16,17,18]
Fink also defended posters that were critical of a student organization on campus known to promote antisemitism, “activism” that is endorsed by UCSA. This student organization has been coddled by social justice, enabled by administration who look the other way as they repeatedly violate the first amendment while seeking censorship of dissenters, across UC’s. [1]
Dean Kang’s response to these posters:
‘“We will deploy all lawful resources to counter any harassment…or intimidation.” [1]’
Kind of sounds like fascism. This is a threat to all students and faculty who dare dissent.
Who is Jerry Kang?
“I am a legal academic who thinks about “technologies” understood very broadly. Half of my work deals with communications and cyberspace, on matters such as privacy, pervasive computing, and computer-mediated communities. The other half deals with civil rights and race, which I have come to view as a socio-cognitive and cultural technology.
As of July 1, 2015, I’ve started my role as Vice Chancellor of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion.
If you’re interested in the work of my new office, please visit equity.ucla.edu. [19]”
Kang’s UCLA biography lists is impressive if you don’t know that the Harvard Implicit Bias test is not valid and that much of what he applies his legal expertise toward is pseudoscience and cultural Marxism disguised as social justice:
“Jerry Kang is Vice Chancellor for Equity, Diversity and Inclusion. He is also Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law, Professor of Asian American Studies (by courtesy) at UCLA, and the inaugural Korea Times — Hankook Ilbo Chair in Korean American Studies and Law.
Professor Jerry Kang’s teaching and research interests include civil procedure, race, and communications. On race, he has focused on the nexus between implicit bias and the law, with the goal of advancing a “behavioral realism” that imports new scientific findings from the mind sciences into legal discourse and policymaking. He is also an expert on Asian American communities, and has written about hate crimes, affirmative action, the Japanese American internment, and its lessons for the “War on Terror.” He is a co-author of Race, Rights, and Reparation: The Law and the Japanese American Internment (2d ed. Wolters Kluwer 2013). [20]”
Yeah, a Vice Chancellor who heads a scam department used as a tool to make students mentally ill, to destroy academic careers, to promote and condone censorship, to help lynch professors, and to undermine the Bill of Rights wasn’t too happy about having a professor undermining the totalitarian witch hunts by his department by teaching students what their rights are.
‘“Vice Chancellor Jerry Kang will post self-written commentaries, other articles and videos on CrossCheck to help students better understand the concept of equity. Kang said he launched the website in late September to provide a central hub for additional information on issues like race and gender discrimination. He added he hopes the website deepens the way UCLA students think and talk about equity.
“Anything I say will create a pushback, whether people think I’ve said too much or not enough,” he said. “But after (the “Kanye Western” themed raid), it was most important for me to convey empathy for students who experienced what they did. [21]’
Are you aware of what’s going on at college campuses? The cultural Marxism being pushed to groom national socialist Bruins? Race and gender are atoms bombs on free speech, which is at the core of science and philosophy. Only white people can be racist because white people are some kind of disease that cause genocide. Look at the USSA website again [22]. This message is being deliberately spread like a disease across America by student lobbying organizations disguised as student governments. And white males are the most privileged and the most biased human beings on Earth, so erase science and philosophy if the author is a white male. And if the philosophy or research contradicts the Nomenklatura and comes from a woman, she’s either internalized misogyny or she’s a racist, homophobic, xenophobic, white supremacist, even if she isn’t white. I kid you not. What Kang champions is code for censorship, discrimination, and totalitarianism disguised as Populism; the destruction of America.
Kang champions destroying science and research to pave the way for one ideology, one ideology is critical for communism to be successful, cultural Marxism.
Fink got in the way. And he knew that administrators wanted him ousted.
So along comes his 18-quarter “Excellence Revue”. The whole thing is fishy. The Interim Dean of Social Sciences, Laura Gómez, heads his “Excellence Review’, a review process that Fink had long been critical of. [24]
“Fink had contested the fairness of the “Excellence Review,” a review lecturers undergo after 18 quarters of teaching to determine whether they meet the university’s standard of excellence, long before UCLA made the decision not to renew his contract. Since Fink’s firing, both UCLA and Fink have publicly disagreed about the reasons why the university chose not to renew Fink’s contract. As detailed in FIRE’s letter, Gómez’s letter notifying Fink of the non-renewal fails to provide specific justifications for the decision. [24]”
After his course was reviewed by someone who wasn’t a lawyer or an expert on free speech, after he was accused of making students feel uncomfortable which was refuted by the students in question, after Fink was given smaller lecture halls and classrooms to cut down on his class size, after people who Fink stated were biased against him and should have recused themselves from his review were part of his review committee while those whom Fink considered unbiased were not, after Fink always gave seniors add slips to his always full courses which were suddenly being denied, after Fink fought with a fascist administration that had already decided to fire him before his bogus evaluation even started, he was let go on June 27. Dean Gomez did not renew his contract. [1,2,3,29]
There’s more. I recommend listening to the YouTube videos below a few times. Links to articles and a PDF authored by FIRE are in the links below. UCLA used Fink to dupe students into enrolling in courses that they may not have chosen otherwise; school departments receive larger shares of revenue from summer course and appeared to used Fink’s popularity to allegedly commit fraud. [25,27]
Fink is an excellent professor with excellent evaluations from his students and his peers. His reviews on Rate My Professor are excellent. His students held protests on campus in support of him despite the online smear campaign that tried to make Fink’s firing seem legitimate.
‘The spat illustrates what Mr. Fink describes as an intolerant culture at the university. “UCLA pays lip service to the notions of academic freedom and viewpoint diversity,” he said, “but there’s an implied understanding among the school’s leaders that this really only applies if your views align with theirs.”[14]’
“School’s leaders” includes teacher’s assistants as well as professors, TA’s like Justin Gelzhiser who defended Fink. [26]
Please, I realize that this is getting long but I promise you that want to know about Gelzhiser, how Communication department manager Jane Bitar threatened Gelzhiser using Title IX and an unsubstantiated sexual assault allegation to induce him to resign as a TA.
“The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights opened an investigation into UCLA on Wednesday for possible sexual harassment under Title IX, a department spokesman said. The investigation follows a complaint filed on behalf of Justin Gelzhiser, a Ph.D. candidate in the Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, which claims the communication department staff threatened to report Gelzhiser to the Title IX office unless he left his teachi ng assistant position in the department. [23]”
Jane Bitar was a mandated reporter as a UCLA employee. She claimed to receive a report of a sexual assault claim against Gelzhiser. There was no report, however. Either Bitar failed to do her job as a mandated reporter and should have been fired, or there was no actual accuser. Obviously, an investigation would go no further, right? You would be wrong. The accused is only allowed whatever aspects of due process that the accuser asks for, like evidence. The accused is totally powerless, at the mercy of whomever makes a claim against him or her. This is anti-male UCLA; the accused are going to be male, grounds for sexual harassment by the accused. Everyone has sexual histories, bizarre internet searches, online jokes, anything that can be dredged up as evidence, which doesn’t have to be much to deem a person guilty of anything. This should scare anyone who fears tyranny and abuse.
The following is from the Dear Colleague letter from April 4th 2011 that fascist UCSA and USSA puppets are so upset that Betsy DeVos rescinded (this is where the hysterical and deliberately outrageously wrong Big Lie fallacy “1-in-5” statistic came from that student government reps keep repeating to push their anti-American agenda despite the flawed research having been debunked):
“The statistics on sexual violence are both deeply troubling and a call to action for the nation. A report prepared for the National Institute of Justice found that about 1 in 5 women are victims of completed or attempted sexual assault while in college.3 page 2
OCR’s work indicates that a number of issues related to an adequate, reliable, and impartial investigation arise in sexual harassment and violence complaints. In some cases, the conduct may constitute both sexual harassment under Title IX and criminal activity. Police investigations may be useful for fact-gathering; but because the standards for criminal investigations are different, police investigations or reports are not determinative of whether sexual harassment or violence violates Title IX. Conduct may constitute unlawful sexual harassment under Title IX even if the police do not have sufficient evidence of a criminal violation. In addition, a criminal investigation into allegations of sexual violence does not relieve the school of its duty under Title IX to resolve complaints promptly and equitably.
As noted above, the Title IX regulation requires schools to provide equitable grievance procedures. As part of these procedures, schools generally conduct investigations and hearings to determine whether sexual harassment or violence occurred. In addressing complaints filed with OCR under Title IX, OCR reviews a school’s procedures to determine whether the school is using a preponderance of the evidence standard to evaluate complaints. The Supreme Court has applied a preponderance of the evidence standard in civil litigation involving discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. Like Title IX, Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex.26 OCR also uses a preponderance of the evidence standard when it resolves complaints against recipients. For instance, OCR’s Case Processing Manual requires that a noncompliance determination be supported by the preponderance of the evidence when resolving allegations of discrimination under all the statutes enforced by OCR, including Title IX.27 OCR also uses a preponderance of the evidence standard in its fund termination administrative hearings.28 Thus, in order for a school’s grievance procedures to be consistent with Title IX standards, the school must use a preponderance of the evidence standard (i.e., it is more likely than not that sexual harassment or violence occurred). The “clear and convincing” standard (i.e., it is highly probable or reasonably certain that the sexual harassment or violence occurred), currently used by some schools, is a higher standard of proof. Grievance procedures that use this higher standard are inconsistent with the standard of proof established for violations of the civil rights laws, and are thus not equitable under Title IX. Therefore, preponderance of the evidence is the appropriate standard for investigating allegations of sexual harassment or violence.
Throughout a school’s Title IX investigation, including at any hearing, the parties must have an equal opportunity to present relevant witnesses and other evidence. The complainant and the alleged perpetrator must be afforded similar and timely access to any information that will be used at the hearing. Pg 11
Throughout a school’s Title IX investigation, including at any hearing, the parties must have an equal opportunity to present relevant witnesses and other evidence. The complainant and the alleged perpetrator must be afforded similar and timely access to any information that will be used at the hearing. For example, a school should not conduct a pre-hearing meeting during which only the alleged perpetrator is present and given an opportunity to present his or her side of the story, unless a similar meeting takes place with the complainant; a hearing officer or disciplinary board should not allow only the alleged perpetrator to present character witnesses at a hearing; and a school should not allow the alleged perpetrator to review the complainant’s statement without also allowing the complainant to review the alleged perpetrator’s statement.
Therefore, any real or perceived conflicts of interest between the fact-finder or decision-maker and the parties should be disclosed.
Public and state-supported schools must provide due process to the alleged perpetrator. However, schools should ensure that steps taken to accord due process rights to the alleged perpetrator do not restrict or unnecessarily delay the Title IX protections for the complainant. Page 12.
When OCR finds that a school has not taken prompt and effective steps to respond to sexual harassment or violence, OCR will seek appropriate remedies for both the complainant and the broader student population. When conducting Title IX enforcement activities, OCR seeks to obtain voluntary compliance from recipients. When a recipient does not come into compliance voluntarily, OCR may initiate proceedings to withdraw Federal funding by the Department or refer the case to the U.S. Department of Justice for litigation. [11]”
The accused have no rights under Title IX, which makes this office the ideal vessel to execute the threat against Gelzhiser to comply obediently and submissively with administration if he wanted to save his college career and professional ambitions.
This is exactly what critics of Title IX had tried to warn other students and administrators would happen. UC’s want to make the Salem Witch Trials great again. They’ve already started at UCLA. UCLA, under Dean Kang and Jane Bitar, tried to burn Gelzhiser at the sexual-assault-accusation stake.
Just how far did administration go to “hunt” Gelzhiser down for defending Fink?
I recently had the honor of listening to Keith Fink give a talk at UCLA, elaborating on the; I can’t think of a word to describe how absolutely loathsome UCLA is on this matter: fraudulent, extortionist, blackmailing, conspiring, criminal, anti-everything good that college and America is supposed to be; ongoing story regarding Fink’s professional lynching. One of Fink’s slides during his talk was of a hidden camera and microphone used by Jane Bitar to spy on Fink’s TA, Justin Gelzhiser. It was hidden in a plant that was in a room where he worked on campus. This story would seem like a paranoid delusion if I wasn’t personally familiar with McCarthyism on college campuses.
Gelzhiser wanted to know what he was accused of, who accused him, any information so he could defend himself. What information he was given, he was able to refute it and prove his innocence. Eventually, the case disappeared because they couldn’t contact the complainant, if she existed at all.
“Gelzhiser said he filed the complaint with the Department of Education in December because he thinks the Title IX process at UCLA is a corrupt system that can lead to abuses of power. He added he thinks the university has not adequately investigated his claims that the communication department misused the Title IX process. [23]”
That’s the beauty of Title IX. You can make shit up and ruin people’s lives. You can say that someone accused you of something and you have no way of finding out if the accusation is even real. And Title IX extends off campus. Students, mostly male, have been kicked out of school because Title IX investigators found them guilty even though there was no victim. And these students have no rights, no due process. “The Crucible” by Arthur Miller is nonfiction at UC’s.
To work at any federally funded college or university, every person must take an oath to uphold the constitution and not work to subvert America.
Jane Bitar has been let go as the sacrificial lamb with a $4,000 reward and a Chancellor’s award handed to her by Dean Kang for her treason. What about Dean Kang? What about Dean Gomez? Dean Johnson? Why have they not been fired for violating this oath? Social justice is American subversion. [28]
What are you going to do about this?
Gelzhiser is still fighting UCLA, just as Professor Fink is still fighting UCLA.
They need our help.
If you donate to any UC, STOP. If you have endowments in place, end them. Find new ways to invest your money that don’t fund treason. Money is the language that UC’s talk. Talk back with financial silence.
Speak up for free speech. If you’re a UC student, Fink actively helps students defend themselves from these anti-academic monstrosities that pretend to be institutions of learning that attack students for thinking out of line.
If your student government obstructs a marketplace of ideas, something they do ALL THE TIME with impunity, keep a diary, keep your camera phone with you and the battery charged ready to record. UCSA is violating our first amendment rights by demanding fees be mandatory on a federally funded campus and then they actively obstruct free speech by disrupting any event or trying to get any professor fired who challenges what UCSA wants you to think. Academic affairs is in student government. Students are being forced to fund illiberal treason through student government. Student government fees can legally be voluntary if enough students gather evidence and go to court over student governments shitting on the first amendment. This is how to best hurt this treason. And when you consider how many students receive financial aid, student government reps promoting increasing student government fees because money magically comes from the government, it’s your money that is funding treason and your entrepreneurship and hard work that is taken for granted by ungrateful national socialists.
This is how the Nomenklatura operates.
Politics is downwind of culture.
And if UCLA is can be used to evaluate this drifting toxic wind, the future of politics is fascist, totalitarian, and suffocating from a lack of freedom, a lack of civil liberties, a lack of art, a lack of science, a lack of philosophy, and a lack of humanity. The Bill of Rights will be dead and we’ll all be defenseless.
It’s time to defund UC’s, who, in conjunction with student government, refuse to allow students to debate H.R. 4030, the Title IX Protection Act, anti-American legislation that of course came out of Commiefornia, on campus. UC’s spend money from mandatory student government fees to fund lobbying efforts that will codify and validate what happened to Gelzhiser by UCLA by promoting this assault on due process by pushing the legislature to approve H.R. 4030. [9]
Help!
[1] Tambo, D. O. R., (2017). Keith Fink Reveals UCLA’s Dirty Tricks to Quash Intellectual Pluralism on Campus. YouTube. Retrieved from: https://youtu.be/33shn7d7jb8
[2] Tambo, D. O. R., (2017). On Tucker Carlson, UCLA microcosm of macrocosm. Emails to kill speak they don’t like or punish students who don’t conform to liberal ideology. YouTube. Retrieved from: https://youtu.be/3ZvMZwzihVM
[3] Tambo, D. O. R., (2017). How UCLA Tramples on Students’ Free Speech. YouTube. Retrieved from: https://youtu.be/ESShMjbmrnA
[4] Fink, K., (2009). Communication Studies 188 : Sex, Politics and Race: Free Speech on Campus University of California, Los Angeles. (Summer 2009). Scribd. Retrieved from: https://www.scribd.com/document/99423813/Sex-Politics-and-Race-Free-Speech-on-Campus-University-of-California-Los-Angeles-Summer-2009-Keith-A-Fink
[5] The Foundation for Critical Thinking, (2017). Socratic Thinking. Retrieved from: https://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/socratic-teaching/606
[6] USSA, (2018). About. United States student association. Retrieved from: http://usstudents.org/about/
[7] UCSA, (2018). Home. University of California Student Association. Retrieved from: https://ucsa.org/
[8] United States Student Association, (2018). Take Action on Your Campus; Ending Sexual Violence: Organize to adopt a Survivor’s bill of rights on your campus. USSA. Retrieved from: https://action.usstudents.org/?fbclid=IwAR1AWfioDAlz-EBY7dJiYBRi4C6oL7P5asA1BfGTpbY8hce-1sV_NexcPmM
[9] Speier, J., (2017). H.R.4030 – Title IX Protection Act. Congress.Gov. Retrieved from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4030/text Know this bill and how to debate it!!!
[10] NAS, (2017). DeVos Rescinds Disastrous “Dear Colleague” Policy on Campus Sexual Misconduct. National Association of Scholars. Retrieved from: https://www.nas.org/articles/devos_rescinds_disastrous_dear_colleague_policy_on_campus_sexual_misconduct
[11] Ali, R., (2011). Dear Colleague letter, April 4th 2011. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights. Retrieved from: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201104.pdf
OCR is the abbreviation for the Office of Civil Rights.
[12] USSA, (2018). What is USSA membership. USSA. Retrieved from: http://dev.usstudents.org/membership/ ( $o.50-$1.00 per student annually based on student population size.)
[13] Lhamon, C. E. (2015). Title IX resource guide. U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. Title IX Resource. Retrieved from: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/dcl-title-ix-coordinators-guide-201504.pdf
[14] Brown, S., (2017). Why Did a UCLA Instructor With a Popular Free-Speech Course Lose His Job? The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from: https://www.chronicle.com/article/Why-Did-a-UCLA-Instructor-With/240521
[15] Kang, J., (2018). CrossCheck, UCLA Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion. Retrieved from: https://equity.ucla.edu/crosscheck/
[16] Caulfield, P., (2011). UCLA outraged after student Alexandra Wallace slams Asians in racist video rant (VIDEO). Daily News. Retrieved from: https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ucla-outraged-student-alexandra-wallace-slams-asians-racist-video-rant-video-article-1.117737
“Ohhhhhhhh! Ching chong ling long ting tong! Ohhhhhhh!” “Hi. In America, we do not talk on our cell phones in the library!”
[17] SirBigDICKNigga, (2011). Asians in the Library: UCLA Rant (Original Uncut Video) and Apology. YouTube. Retrieved from: https://youtu.be/zQR01qltgo8
[18] Wong, J., (2011). Ching Chong! Asians in the Library Song (Response to UCLA’s Alexandra Wallace). YouTube. Retrieved from: https://youtu.be/zulEMWj3sVA
(Listen to 18 after 17. You won’t regret it.)
[19] Kang, J., (2015). Home. Jerry Kang, vice chancellor for equity, diversity and inclusion | ucla law prof. Retrieved from: http://jerrykang.net/
[20] UCLA Law, (2018). Jerry Kang. Faculty profiles. Retrieved from: https://www.law.ucla.edu/faculty/faculty-profiles/jerry-kang/#!
[21] Wilcox, A., (2015). Vice chancellor Jerry Kang launches CrossCheck, talks social issues. Daily Bruin. Retrieved from: http://dailybruin.com/2015/10/19/vice-chancellor-jerry-kang-launches-crosscheck-talks-social-issues/
[22] USSA, (2018). State of emergency. United States Student Association. Retrieved from: http://usstudents.org/state-of-emergency/
[23] Bharanidaran, R., (2018). UCLA TA claims department targeted him with threat of Title IX complaint. Daily Bruin. Retrieved by: https://dailybruin.com/2018/01/29/ucla-ta-claims-department-targeted-him-with-threat-of-title-ix-complaint/
[24] McLaughlin, S., (2017). FIRE raises questions about UCLA lecturer Keith Fink’s firing. Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. Retrieved from: https://www.thefire.org/fire-raises-questions-about-ucla-lecturer-keith-finks-firing/
[25] FIRE, (2017). FIRE letter to UCLA. Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. Retrieved from: https://d28htnjz2elwuj.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/04162016/FIRE-letter-to-UCLA-August-2017.pdf
[26] Rate My Professor, (2018). Keith Fink. Rate My Professor. Retrieved from: http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=1095278
[27] Farkas, S., (2017). Ousted conservative prof accuses UCLA of ‘bait & switch’. Campus Reform. Retrieved from: https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=9587
[28] Davis, K., (2018). Communication department manager Jane Bitar receives chancellor’s award, retires after 37 years. New Bruin. Retrieved from: https://dailybruin.com/2018/07/23/communication-department-manager-jane-bitar-receives-chancellors-award-retires-after-37-years/
[29] Vladimirov, N., (2017). Prof exposes UCLA’s ‘dirty tricks’ against conservatives. Campus Reform. Retrieved from: https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=10153
[30] Zuluaga, S., (2015). EVP Office Advocates for Survivor’s Bill of Rights. New University. Retrieved from: https://www.newuniversity.org/2015/04/15/evp-office-advocates-for-survivors-bill-of-rights/
“USSA members compiled the Survivor’s Bill of Rights as an attempt to gain formal, institutional support by university campuses as well as federal and state governments toward survivors of sexual violence.
The bill asks for campuses to treat cases of sexual and domestic violence seriously and execute appropriate sanctions. Administration should recognize sexual assault as serious, violent offenses and take necessary actions, such as removing the offender from all campus activities and grounds.”
Alexandria Jane 