By Alexandria Jane.
So, we’ve gone through how colleges are making students insane. Cult indoctrination is not education. The Department of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion had been forced onto college campuses that did not have the problems that EDI was supposed to solve, so they tried to create the problems themselves or just palter A LOT. Thanks to EDI, censorship is present to keep us poor, weak, fragile little fucks from fainting at the sound of a bird chirping out of tune. The purpose of EDI is to hide in plain sight that colleges and universities like UC’s are practicing pseudoscience. They have been practicing pseudoscience. By making students so retarded that they think it’s bad to challenge fairy tales like man-made global warming, white supremacy, and whether or not there are 496 genders, bad science is no longer tested. You can’t test it without being called a racist, homophobic, transphobic, climate denying, holocaust denying, AIDS denying, the-sky-is-blue denying, genocidal white supremacist or ethnic sell-out. You gotta check your privilege. Don’t speak.
Pseudoscience is science that cannot be tested. Censored science is pseudoscience. It’s bullshit.
So now we have tons of bullshit disguised as research that echo each other. And because college has made students so profoundly illiterate, the appearance of a consensus is used to persuade us that fiction is nonfiction, that the sky is lime green, and that humans are a disease that need to be eradicated. Thanos is God. We’ve taken the anti-life nature of non-secular religions and transformed them into a quasi-death cult at our colleges. Our first exhale is our original sin. All thanks the corruption of science and the deliberate corruption of education to create a generation so illiterate, so intolerant, and so self-righteous that they CAN’T be taught what science requires to be valid. Like good cult members, they constantly fall back on dogma instead of face the reality that they are highly educated stupid people.
Let’s look at how censorship on college campuses has poisoned degree programs. You can’t debate any of this shit on a college campus or you’ll be thrown out through Title IX because you’ll offend someone or be accused of harassment. Title IX is under EDI. Not a coincidence. And now law programs are setting their degree programs around this pseudoscience.
I first noticed how fishy UC law programs were in 2016, when stepping foot on any UC was surrounding yourself in a campaign for totalitarianism and a campaign against our President Trump, the only candidate who was not a UN sell-out. Stein, Sanders, fake Libertarian Mr. Gary “What-is-Allepo” Johnson, and “Vote for me because I have a vagina” Clinton were all sell-outs pushing globalist communism through gloBULL warming alarmism. Honestly, if you critically read about this scam beyond the propaganda that pollutes our fascist media and fascist colleges, it’s easy to see that this is a racketeering scam that is effectively compromises the sovereignty of many countries around the world, including the very resource-rich countries in the continent of Africa. And you can study law that endorses this crime as though it’s real. Think about that. Aiding and abetting crime is a degree program at UC’s.
But wait, there’s more. The law programs at UC’s are even more evil than you probably realize.
What has made America great? We are a democratic republic, not a democracy. A democracy is tyranny. Tyranny, unless you’re a communist wannabe leader who wants to totally control millions of people, is not good. America has avoided tyranny by setting up a government that allows a state of 12 people to have as much power and say as a state of 20 million people. Eligible voters in each state elect people they think best represent their state in order to form a more perfect union. Our government really is quite magnificent in how it was set up to protect us Americans from tyranny.
It’s naïve to believe that America is not always under attack for her resources and that internal and external forces don’t seek to undermine what prevents us from being a totalitarian state; the constitution and bill of rights. Currently, our legislative process is being undermined by courts that not only accept pseudoscientific propaganda from UC’s and other indoctrination camps: they offer law programs in this shit. The goal is to use courts to undermine our current legislative process that is supposed to give the power to voters. UC’s are actively undermining every American voter through our courts. No more peer review process. Now we’ll have judges with UCI degrees determining whether or not a climate scientist who calls a pseudoscientist a fraud has defamed the propogandist and should be punished by law instead of doing what scientists used to, DEBATE. UC’s aren’t promoting fascism in America. They’re making America fascist.
This is insubordination. Every federal worker takes an oath not to fucking insubordinate the American government. Instead of firing and arresting people for committing treason, we’re giving them billions of dollars a year in federal money. We Americans are funding the death of our democratic republic in pursuit of mad tyranny. Don’t believe me? Go to any UC and ask students, especially Political Science grad students, what they think about the electoral college. Ask student government leaders what they think about due process in cases involving alleged sexual assault. Ask them if offensive speech should be censored, and then to define offensive speech. Ask them if people should inherit family wealth or if the government should redistribute everything your family worked hard to build and acquire. Ask them if we should have borders and if illegal immigration/trafficking of little girls into sex slavery is as beautiful as their sociology professors would have them believe on a midterm. Ask them if white males are a disease, grounds for rewriting what white males created in America: the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Ask them about what equality is and what steps should be taken to promote and ensure equality. If you have weapons at home, lock them up, because these edumacated stupid people will probably make you want to kill yourself out of horror and despair.
Let’s take a look at UC law departments, programs, and trusty fascist library research guides:
“Students develop practical legal skills through public interest work in core clinics including appellate litigation; community and economic development; criminal justice; domestic violence; environmental law; immigrant rights; intellectual property, arts, technology; and international justice. The school also offers elective clinics in topics such as fair employment and housing rights; civil rights litigation; international human rights; reproductive justice; and startup and small business issues.
The School of Law also is highly interdisciplinary, with many faculty members holding joint appointments across the campus. Students can take courses in other fields and can earn joint degrees in almost any area. A robust array of programs complements the school’s curriculum including speaker series and a myriad of student organizations.
The school received its founding gift from the Donald Bren Foundation to endow 10 faculty chairs and a dean’s chair. It also received generous support from the Joan Irvine Smith and Athalie R. Clarke Foundation and Mark P. Robinson Jr.
The school was granted full accreditation from the American Bar Association in June 2014.
UCI Law is No. 21 in the U.S. News and World Report ranking of Best Law Schools. U.S. News & World Report also ranks UCI Law:
No. 5 for best student/faculty ratio in the top 25
Top 13 for Student Diversity
No. 13 for Clinical Training
No. 21 for Intellectual Property Law [1]”
Seems kind of harmless if you’ve never actually thought about what some of these topics mean or the various totalitarian ways in which these topics can be used to strip every American of any legal rights to protect us from a tyrannical government.
Divsersity does not mean diversity of thought at UC’s. The following statements sound nice until you realize that what is really being built here is a wall to protect pseudoscience from being exposed for the fraud that we’re funding for billions of dollars a year to undermine our great country. Applying this lack of diversity of thought into law is applying one ideology into a government regime that uses courts to undermine legislature and turn our courts into a tyrannical quasi legislature.
“Diversity in the Libraries
“Diversity is a dynamic tapestry rather than a static list of attributes. Every person is a complex individual with multiple overlapping identities. The UCI Libraries recognizes the value of each individual based on unique characteristics which may include commonly acknowledged measures of diversity such as ethnicity, race, gender, age, veteran status, sexual orientation, physical abilities, and religion. We also recognize and appreciate that diversity extends beyond these measures to include many other characteristics related to experience, cultural heritage, personality type, learning style, and much more. [2]”
— from the UCI Libraries Diversity Statement
“The UCI Libraries celebrates diversity in its users, staff, collections and resources. We are dedicated to providing an environment where everyone feels welcomed, valued and respected. As the intellectual crossroads for the campus, we work diligently to develop, and make available, collections and services that support the diverse needs of the UCI community.”
— Lorelei Tanji, University Librarian [3]”
Now, enter law programs where you can’t question what you’re taught. Seriously, I’d wonder how such vile corruption and treason could be so blatantly out in the open if we didn’t have criminals running the White House for the past twenty years until Trump was elected. If Trump continues to fund this treason, I suppose that’s evidence to support Trump being a criminal too.
Let’s look at some course descriptions. Being a freedom-loving artist myself, the last course is particularly repulsive on so many levels. We really are very close to the dystopia that Ayn Rand depicted in Atlas Shrugged, all thanks to social justice:
CRM/LAW C275 SEC 1 – Critical Identity Theory
This course will broadly engage the study of anti-subordination legal movements that arose out of the traditions of American legal realism and Critical Legal Studies. Particular attention will be paid to germinal writings in Critical Race Theory (CRT), feminist legal theory, law and sexuality, law and socioeconomic class, and Latina/o Critical (LATCRIT) Theory. We will also engage the results of a number of sociolegal studies of law and identity. The course will be organized around exploring a set of questions related to the legal significance of identity. For example, we will explore the following questions: In what ways does the law define, dismiss, or privilege certain identities? How does law influence our understandings and experiences of identity? What are the potential and limits of law to challenge subordination and remedy inequality? How do individuals and groups construct their identities in connection with or in opposition to the law?
This is a Winter 2019 main campus quarter class. The class is offered for 4 quarter units which equates to 2.6 semester units for law students. There is an option to enroll in a 0.4 unit independent study to make the total units for the class 3.0. To enroll in this quarter class you must submit the online academic petition to enroll in a quarter class. Once approved by Professor Gustafson please submit to the Law School Registrar for processing. You will not be able to enroll in this class via LawReg.
If you will be enrolling in the additional 0.4 unit independent study, you must submit a separate online academic request for an independent study with Professor Gustafson. Professor Gustafson must sign the petition and it should then be submitted to the Law School Registrar for processing. You will receive the class and authorization codes to add the independent study via LawReg.
https://apps.law.uci.edu/CourseCatalog/cap_details.aspx?id=2206
LAW 5300 SEC 1 – Identity, Power & Professional Responsibility
Identity, Power & Professional Responsibility will broadly examine how both traditionally marginalized group members and dominant group members navigate their identities in predominantly white professions. Students will explore existing identity performance strategies that are prominent in the law –such as assimilation, covering, and passing–that “outsiders” (e.g., women, people of color, LGBTQ, persons with disabilities) use to communicate with “insiders” (commonly white, heterosexual males), as well as the role of white privilege in the legal profession. This course will engage students in an interdisciplinary view of identity performance, and expose them to in-depth communication practices that can actually facilitate conscious identity performance before their legal careers even begin. Students will complete an upper level or scholarly writing on an identity performance strategy or related issue.
LAW 5310 SEC 1 – Supreme Court & Public Policy
This course examines the role of the U.S. Supreme Court in public policy, and how constitutional interpretation affects and impacts policy making. The course will explore normative and scholarly debates on judicial activism and constitutional interpretation, theories of judicial politics and decision making, judicial impact, and critical approaches. Substantively, the course will explore the broader political and policy context of the Court’s decisions in the following areas: federalism, executive power, civil rights, abortion, LGBTQ rights, campaign finance and voting rights, economic rights/labor rights, immigration, and affirmative action.
LAW 5681 SEC 1 – Law and Social Movements
Transformative social movements generate shared understanding that the problems of climate change, racism and all social injustice, economic inequality, and our challenged democracy are connected. They also view the solutions as intertwined. Participants in this seminar will survey and examine the relationships between law and transformative social movements, both the actual collaborations between lawyers and groups of political activists, as well as the work of lawyers as political activists. The seminar brings the frameworks and practices of transformative social movements together with approaches to lawyering that protect, defend, and embolden movements for racial, social, and environmental justice, both here and abroad. The seminar then focuses on six living case studies of specific communities across the United States that view themselves as part of a “just transition” to community ownership and deep democracy for climate, racial, economic, and social justice. Seminar participants will gain understanding of the gaps, challenges, and opportunities for stronger integration of movement organizers and movement lawyers in crafting a just transition.
LAW 5304 SEC 1 – Disparate LGBTIQ Criminalization & Incarceration
LGBTIQ (lesbian, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and questioning) persons are substantially more likely to be incarcerated, and substantially more likely to be abused once incarcerated, than heterosexual cisgender persons. This course will familiarize students with the legal mechanisms that lead to disparate criminal justice outcomes for LGBTIQ persons, and includes relevant constitutional law, California law, data, policy, and academic work in the intersections of race, income, gender, gender identity/expression, and sexual orientation; and, encourage students to explore potential changes in law and policy to reduce such disparities.
The course syllabus includes:
-Academic work regarding disparate criminal profiling of LGBTIQ persons;
-Qualitative and quantitative research on disparate policing of LGBTIQ persons–especially persons of color and transgender/gender nonconforming persons;
-Relevant Fourth Amendment cases regarding reasonable suspicion for stings, stops, and detentions of LGBTIQ persons profiled by police;
-Academic work regarding abuse of incarcerated LGBTIQ persons, including segregated housing, lack of adequate medical care, denial of access to programming, rape, and hypermasculinity in incarcerated populations;
-Relevant sections of the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) that apply specifically to LGBTIQ populations;
-Bureau of Justice Statistics data collected under PREA on the rape and sexual abuse of incarcerated LGBTIQ persons;
-Relevant Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment cases regarding safety, housing, and medical care of LGBTIQ persons, including the (now rescinded) Department of Justice guidance on housing of transgender persons;
-Relevant Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment equal protection cases regarding disparate treatment of incarcerated LGBTIQ persons;
-Relevant California law including non-discrimination provisions, the criminal code, and the Racial and Identity Profiling Act;
-Recent policy changes in jail and prison facilities’ treatment of LGBTIQ persons in response to community and legal advocacy and litigation.
The course may also include guest speakers from the community to discuss their own experiences of being profiled, incarcerated, and advocacy work to change law and policy around LGBTIQ criminal justice issues
LAW 5566 SEC 1 – The Inclusion Rider and Other Strategies for Advancing Equity in the Workplace
This course will explore a handful of key strategies for advancing equity in the workplace, including the instructor’s work on the Inclusion Rider for film and television and the role of litigation in workplace equality. [4]”
Emmett Institute on Climate Change & the Environment at UCLA is creating the next generation of fascists, a direct assault on our democratic republic that does nothing but hurt the environment and push a racketeering scam that kills people through disease, cold, and terrorism. Taxpayer funded treason. Useful idiots of course won’t admit to being duped. Cognitive dissonance is a powerful tool. Make sure to check out their anti-energy independence section called “Recent Publications”. These useful idiots are talented, that’s for sure. What a waste of talent and brains. This makes UC’s all the more awful. They’re diverting talent from being great discovers into being mediocre, of having less value than janitors when it comes to us working towards an actual greater good. At least the janitor is doing something of value. UC’s have made janitors have more value than professors. [5]
I could go on and on. UC Davis, holy shit! But I can’t say “Holy Shit” because I could be referring to cow shit and obviously cow farts are causing catastrophic global warming; I might offend someone. Luckily, Davis offers courses to help us mitigate the effects of cow farts on the apocalypse that is mankind and departments of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion is there to protect the weak-minded from being offended by monsters like myself while the entirety of UC’s works tirelessly to keep students weak and intolerant cult members.
UC’s must be defunded to preserve America and protect our country from fascism and totalitarian communism. Our country wouldn’t be in the shape that it’s in if colleges were teaching students how to think, not what to think. What UC’s are doing, how they are exploiting human nature and capping talent by creating pseudoscientific degree programs that render human goodness totally useless and worthless is vile all by itself. Compare this to the goal of the total insubordination of Americans by aiming to use courts to undermine our legislative process, I honestly don’t know which is worse. They both aim replace our mental freedom with government, a true zombie apocalypse.
Science and discovery depend on free speech. Our freedom as Americans depends on free speech. What happens when free speech is limited for any reason? The propaganda that colleges are producing to undermine every aspect of America that protects us from a tyrannous government is what can happen. And it already is.
[1] University of California, Irvine, (2019). School of Law. UCI. Retrieved from: https://uci.edu/academics/law.php
[2] University of California, Irvine, (2019). Library: Diversity in the Libraries. Retrieved from: https://www.lib.uci.edu/diversity-in-the-libraries
[3] University of California, Irvine, (2019). Library: Diversity in the libraries: our commitment. https://www.lib.uci.edu/our-commitment
[4] School of Law, University of California, Irvine, (2019). Course Catalog. Retrieved from: https://apps.law.uci.edu/CourseCatalog/cap_details.aspx?id=2206
Here are links to two course catalog PDF’s:
Fall 2017 https://www.law.uci.edu/academics/registrar/course-catalog/course-catalog-Fall-2017.pdf
Spring 2018 https://www.law.uci.edu/academics/registrar/course-catalog/course-catalog-Spring-2018.pdf
[5] University of California, Los Angeles, (2019). Emmett Institute on Climate Change & the Environment. Retrieved from: https://www.law.ucla.edu/centers/environmental-law/emmett-institute-on-climate-change-and-the-environment/main/
[6] Mitloehner, F. (2016). Livestock and climate change. College of Agriculture and Environmental sciences, UC Davis. Retrieved from: https://caes.ucdavis.edu/news/articles/2016/04/livestock-and-climate-change-facts-and-fiction
More on Equity Riders here: https://annenberg.usc.edu/research/aii, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2018/03/05/what-is-an-inclusion-rider-explaining-frances-mcdormands-call-to-action-at-the-oscars/?utm_term=.d5002c363212, and https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/hey-hollywood-time-adopt-nfls-754659
Here is what the research looks like:
Click to access MDSCI_CARD_Report_FINAL_Exec_Summary.pdf
Click to access Dr_Stacy_L_Smith-Inequality_in_900_Popular_Films.pdf
Click to access MDSCI_Inequality_in_800_Films_FINAL.pdf
https://annenberg.usc.edu/sites/default/files/2017/04/10/MDSCI_Inequality_in_800_Films_FINAL.pdf sdsemihidden1
Alexandria Jane 